Are Mrs. Dodd's Deals Fishy?

The Hartford Courant’s Ed Mahony and Jon Lender – the duo widely credited for blowing open the Rowland scandals – have turned their focus to Senator Chris Dodd and his wife, Jackie Clegg Dodd, this week.  Their Sunday story raised questions about the propriety of Mrs. Dodd’s participation on at least five corporate boards – earning her more than $500,000 in compensation last year.

The crux of the matter seems to be this: is this a case of big corporations influencing the decisions of the Chairman of the Banking Committee or is Mrs. Dodd a well-qualified member of these boards who would likely be there anyway?

The question provoked strong responses from the chiefs of each Connecticut political party yesterday.  Connecticut Republican Party Chairman Chris Healy released a statement that was highly critical of Mrs. Dodd, essentially reprising his blog post on the issue from Sunday.  The sharpest quote from Healy:

“You don’t become a board member with this thin a resume unless you know someone,” said Healy.

A response, albeit a bit plaintive, came quickly from Connecticut Democratic Chair Nancy DiNardo via e-mail:

Despite what Mr. Healy and the Republicans will try to spin, Jackie should not have to give up her career just because she married a public official. We long ago got over that viewpoint in our society, at least for most of us.

The e-mail goes on to encourage Connecticut Democrats to make a contribution to the Dodd campaign volunteer for Sen. Dodd add a comment to the Courant article online supporting Mrs. Dodd.

That Chairwoman DiNardo would seek to raise the shrill cry of sexism so quickly is telling.  While there surely is more to reveal, the facts as presented seem straightforward.  Mrs. Dodd, as an officer at the Import/Export Bank and a legislative aide, had a background which arguably could be enough experience for some of these boards. 

But the more serious are the questions related to the financial audit committees, which are required to be populated by people with a strong accounting background.  Mrs. Dodd does not have such experience.  It is on these audit committees, in particular, where Mrs. Dodd’s presence seems like an obvious insurance policy for the big corporations: what federal regulator wants to raise serious questions about corporate books audited by the Senate Banking Committee Chairman’s wife?

The traditional and obvious response would simply to have Mrs. Dodd resign from the boards – particularly the financial audit committees.  But Mrs. Dodd and her defenders seem pretty hot about the sexism/fairness argument – perhaps compelling them to hold the line.  At the same time, these are lucrative positions that help pay for the Dodd’s expensive lifestyle.  Can they afford to go without money?

The next moves in this situation will be made by Mr. and Mrs. Dodd, and it will be fascinating to see what they do.

5 responses to “Are Mrs. Dodd's Deals Fishy?

  1. Bruce Rubenstein

    It would be interesting to see who many other spouces,male and female, of Senators have directorships of any kind. I bet there are many who do, of both parties.

  2. AndersonScooper

    Bruce, the influence peddling, back-scratching and nepotism run deep. On both sides of the aisle.

    What’s incredible is that after putting this above the fold on Sunday, yesterday the Courant gave this another story, which was just recycling the last.

    Where were Mahoney and Lender when it came to Haddasah Lieberman working as a lobbyist for Hill & Knowlton?

    And of course the CT GOP said not a word as they gladly embraced the back-stabbing Lieberman against Lamont.

    Anyway, I look forward to Lender and Mahoney digging into the client list of Sam Caliguiri’s law firm, Day Pitkin. That’s got to be an even bigger conflict of interest than Jackie Dodd’s board memberships.

    PS– Lender could also write about Governor Rell’s son Michael, who she got a plum $70,000/year job as a Republican staffer at the Statehouse.

  3. Where were Mahoney and Lender when it came to Haddasah Lieberman working as a lobbyist for Hill & Knowlton?

    Wait — are you serious? Mahoney, Lender and McEnroe put John Rowland behind bars. Are you honestly suggesting they have something against Democrats?!?

  4. Bruce Rubenstein

    I agree Anderson….both parties seem to have a system whereby the non elected Senatorial spouce becomes a lobbyist/director/consultant for a large amount of money.This is how the elected person is paid off by the political elite and by those large companies and interest groups that might have legislative business before Congress.While it seems to be all perfectly legal,it doesn’t pass my individual smell test.While I recognize that folks do not take a vow of poverty to attain elected office and while I do agree that folks need to have 2 income earners often,I wish there was a better way.

    I absolutely agree with you about Rell,Caliguri and Lieberman and the Courant writers,who seem to be going after Mrs Dodd for something that many others do.

  5. Bruce Rubenstein

    Wait — are you serious? Mahoney, Lender and McEnroe put John Rowland behind bars. Are you honestly suggesting they have something against Democrats?!?

    Mr Dobb…..your poor-mouthing that the Courant writers don’t go after Democrats is in error. I have seen their articles on Joe Ganim,Ernie Newton,Eddie Perez and many others.The reason why they haven’t gone after a Democratic Governor yet is because we havent had one since 1990, but rest assured if and when we have a Democratic Governor, and if and when there is corruption in that Governor’s administration, they will write about it with the same fervor that they do about Republican corruption.We need a impartial and strong 4th estate to keep both parties in check and honest.The best dissinfectant is the light of day.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s