The Courant's EDR Coverage and a Goodbye

I am leaving Connecticut Local Politics, effective as soon as you finish reading this post, and I wanted to take a second to say goodbye. I’ve been writing for CTLP for more than three years and I’ve enjoyed every moment of it. This is a great site that has spawned a vibrant community and I wanted to thank everyone involved, the lurkers, the commenters, the other Front-Pagers, and especially Genghis Conn. I never imagined when I joined up in 2006, the places this site would take me or the people I would meet. I will always be grateful to GC for giving me the opportunity. Hopefully I had some impact, and you enjoyed it as much as I did.

I thought it would be appropriate to finish where I started – with a post on election law. So here’s one more EDR post for the road…

From the Courant’s EDR coverage:

The battle has flared for years, dating back to even before a veto in 2003 by then-Gov. John G. Rowland.

Back in July 2003, Rowland cited the likelihood of fraud as a reason for his veto of the bill that would have permitted Election Day registration for the first time in state history and would have allowed Connecticut to join six other states at the time with similar laws.

Rowland actually was a little more detailed in his reasoning in vetoing EDR in 2003:

The process of registering to vote on Election Day, as proposed, would provide few, if any, safeguards to prevent voter fraud. In addition, the proposed system would undoubtedly result in reliance by the municipalities on the statewide centralized voter registration database, which, at this time, is largely untested.

Connecticut’s centralized voter registration database does not, at this time, contain complete and current voter registration information. Certain municipalities have not yet joined the statewide voter registration system and are in the process of doing so. The election officials in those towns and cities require time to input and transmit accurate, complete and current voter registration information to the statewide centralized voter registration database. Without an accurate, complete, up-to-date and real-time centralized voter registration database, there would be few safeguards in place to prevent an individual, particularly one without a photo identification, from registering and voting in multiple towns on Election Day.

Leaving aside for a second the absurdity of the notion that someone would register and vote in multiple towns on Election Day (given that they either are resigned to get caught for a felony and use their own ID (and keep lying about the address?), or engage in a massive criminal conspiracy to gain multiple IDs in order to, um, change an election by a handful of votes. Awesome.), Rowland’s principal reason for the veto, unnoted by the Courant, has since been addressed. There now is a statewide centralized voter registration database, it now keeps complete and current voter registration information, all municipalities have joined the database, and no election officials are painstakingly transmitting existing voter registrations to the database. Of course, I have no idea if Gov. Rowland would have plucked some other reason to veto this legislation out of the air; hopefully Gov. Rell will not.

On fraud in general, I would point the interested to this post, detailing a five-year full court press on voter fraud by the Bush administration, turning up, whoops!, bupkis. And to the fact that in a quarter of a century of studies of EDR, there is no evidence of an increased level of fraud under the system. And to the experiences of the other EDR states, and the well-documented findings, that fraud is not a byproduct of EDR.

In terms of a positive case for EDR, read this; for what goes wrong without EDR, try this and this.

Thanks again everybody, and I’ll see you soon!

Advertisements

10 responses to “The Courant's EDR Coverage and a Goodbye

  1. Gabe, you are hopelessly liberal, and you write the longest blog posts I have ever seen.

    But I considered it an honor and a pleasure to share the front page with you while we did, and always enjoyed our sparring.

    Hope to see you soon in a format you can restrict to 5,000 characters.

    Best wishes!

  2. Thanks for you efforts Gabe! Any new ventures on the horizon? Are you finishing law school now and moving elsewhere?

    As for HH’s comments… ummm… I think it’s sailor who usually wins the longest post competition (said with love, of course!).

  3. And since we are on the topic of legislation that Democrats are advancing to avoid discussing the budget, read this little tidbit:

    http://southernconnecticutcommunity.com/politicalcapitol/2009/05/27/state-unions-increasing-pressure-on-dems-wary-of-progressive-income-tax/

    Dems that don’t vote for raising taxes are in between a rock and a hard-on.

  4. As for HH’s comments… ummm… I think it’s sailor who usually wins the longest post competition (said with love, of course!).

    Actually that’s true… Sailor’s posts have character development, chapters,denouement, and a dedication at the beginning.

  5. Gabe, thanks for all your top-shelf writing, and I wish you the very best in all your future endeavors!

  6. Oh crap. You’ve been one of the best of the CT blogosphere. I have appreciated your thoughtful approach, your quick wit, and your original content. I hope your successor shares your strengths. Best wishes.

  7. Bruce Rubenstein

    Good luck Gabe and thank you for your progressive writings…

  8. Thank you everyone for your kind words. And Bruce, I think I still owe you a lunch at the Wood-n-Tap – shoot me an email to collect.

    Hope to see you soon in a format you can restrict to 5,000 characters.

    God forbid. 😉

  9. Congratulations and good luck. Where are you going?

  10. Bruce Rubenstein

    Gabe..you do owe me and I dont have your email address….call me at 860-527-9611 or email me at brucerubenstein7@aol.com to make arrangements….Best,Bruce

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s